ArbiHonor has completed the parallel configuration of onshore balance-sheet capital and offshore fund capital. The structure resolves a persistent practical obstacle in cross-border dispute funding: the two sides of a single matter often need capital from different sources, in different currencies, available at the same time.
The usual approach has been to phase funding, which imposes a real strategic constraint on enforcement matters that require simultaneous filing. The dual structure lets us genuinely synchronise onshore attachment with offshore recognition and enforcement.
The compliance path has been confirmed by legal opinions on both sides, covering cross-border capital flow, foreign-exchange administration and related-party arrangements.
Further reading
ArbiHonor Singapore grows mandate volume as SE Asia share rises
Southeast Asian matters continue to grow as a share of new commitments, led by construction and energy arbitration.
The ArbiHonor Quarterly, Q3 2026: How acquisition structures reprice enforceability
When the funder becomes the claim holder, underwriting shifts from merits to enforceability. This issue examines the consequences for the pricing model.
The PRC–Hong Kong mutual enforcement arrangements in practice: three years of data
Since the arrangements took effect, filing and enforcement data show a picture that does not entirely match the design expectation.
Does this development bear on your claim?
Submit the facts. The underwriting team will review them against this development and identify where it applies, without charge.