ArbiHonor 中诚 · Legal Finance
Case Review Sign in
The Firm Overview The FirmTeamCompliance & Governance
Funding Overview Claim Acquisition & Advance FundingSingle-Case FundingPortfolio FundingJudgment & Award EnforcementLaw Firm Fee FinancingDebt Restructuring & NPL Resolution
Disputes Disputes
Track Record Track Record
Insights Insights
Funders Funders
Language 中文
Investors

China-related claims,underwritten by people who collect there.

Most funders see China-related claims late, second-hand and with no view on enforcement. You see them after a seven-dimension assessment, an independent review signed by a named lawyer, and a map of where the debtor’s assets actually are. A judgment does not track rates or an index; whether it pays depends on reachable assets — an underwriting question, not a macro one.

US$ 3.84bn
Claim value handled
Since 2017
63
Matters concluded
Settled or finally decided
78%
Won or settled
Of concluded matters, losses included
21
Jurisdictions where we act
Seats and enforcement venues

Three reasons to allocate, two reasons to hesitate

A pitch that leaves out the second half is not worth your time, so here it is.

Attractive
Uncorrelated with the macro cycle

Recovery turns on the facts and on enforceability. Portfolio performance in 2020 and 2022 showed no identifiable relationship to equity or credit markets.

+
Attractive
Pricing comes from information, not leverage

The discount reflects how accurately the underwriting team reads collectability. That edge scales with capability rather than with borrowing.

+
Attractive
Downside is bounded and known

The maximum loss on a matter is the amount deployed plus any adverse-costs security given — both known before deployment.

+
Difficult
It is illiquid

Matters run eighteen to forty months and the timing cannot be forecast. A secondary market exists but is thin and prices at a real discount. This is not capital that can leave early.

−
Difficult
Outcomes have a long tail

Portfolio averages hide how binary individual matters are — most recover well, a minority go to zero. Averages are meaningless below a certain sample size.

−
Terms · indicative
Vehicle Cayman LP with an onshore parallel vehicle
Investment period Four years, one-year extension
Single-matter cap 12% of total commitments
Jurisdiction cap 30% per enforcement jurisdiction
Distribution Deal-by-deal down the waterfall
Reporting Quarterly portfolio report plus material-event notices

Indicative only and superseded by the constitutional documents. Not an offer.

Underwriting discipline

What a claim goes through before you see it

Public cards are redacted because counterparties require it. Behind them is the same file our investment committee votes on.

Scored on seven dimensions

Merits 25, claim-to-cost 20, recoverability 15, enforcement venue 15, duration 10, counsel 10, legality 5. Scored from the file first, then challenged line by line.

Reviewed independently, signed by name

Every score is reviewed by a lawyer who did not originate the claim. Scores can be overridden, but the original stays on the record beside the change, and the reviewer signs the assessment.

Redacted, but checkable

Public cards show type, forum, claim band, funding sought, expected multiple and stage. Registered investors see the dimension scores, security structure and milestones; diligence opens the underlying file under NDA.

Priority return

Capital is repaid from recoveries ahead of the claimant’s share, in an order fixed before deployment. No matter exceeds 12% of commitments, and no enforcement jurisdiction 30%.

Investor access is opened by hand, and only after identity, source-of-funds and sanctions checks are complete; it cannot be self-granted. Nothing here is an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy, an interest in any fund or matter.

Diligence us before we diligence a claim.

We will send the concluded-matter file, including the losses, before any subscription conversation.